Monthly Archives: March 2006

Some bills just won’t die

We have maybe two days left in this legislative session. Some bills that have struggled to survive are begining to find new life.

SB 596 – A bill that started out banning cloning, now currently names an already existent blood bank. A definition change was made in committee and the bill may be available for floor action in the House on Monday. The bill will then need to go back to the Senate to accept or reject the definitional change. If they reject — I would expect a conference committee to take the bill and then — all bets are off as to what the final product will be.

SB 541 – Will be heard by the Judiciary Committee upon adjournment today. The author is pressing on despite being told by businesses that the law is pre-empted by federal law. The bill will make sending materials to minors, which the minors by law cannot possess, a felony.

SB 425 – E-mail tax — The Author, Sen. Greg Goggans, a dentist, claims this bill protects family, children and schools from internet predators. But, the hearings failed to call upon experts to testify as to the validity of that claim. What the bill does is require you, as a business person, to pay a “vendor” to check your list against a “do not mail” list once every month, and to charge you $10 per thousand names to do so. Now, there is no provision to advertise the existence of the list, no provision to tell business owners that should they send a minor, or anyone else, mail they do not wish to recieve, you would be guilty of a felony.

Just a few minutes ago, the bill was moved from Judiciary to the House Public Utilities Committee. That committee is chaired by Jeff Lewis, who co-chaired the committee that wrote SB 120, which “deregulated” the Internet. I guess now he wants a chance to “regulate” the Internet.

Of course, if you pass SB 541, there is no need for SB 425.

So, why would you want to use technology in Georgia — if all you do is increase your risk of law suits or jail time?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Creativity + Knowledge = Global Success

That is the formula found in Friedman’s column today.

My guess is that we’re at the start of a global convergence in education: China and India will try to inspire more creativity in their students. America will get more rigorous in math and science. And this convergence will be a great spur to global growth and innovation. It’s a win-win. But some will win more than others — and it will be those who get this balance right the fastest, in the most schools.

The last line … that is where the prize is… 

Leave a comment

Filed under Education, Uncategorized

Digital Scouts for Digital Literacy

Pip Coburn of Coburn Ventures opines in his columen for Always On about the need for “being prepared” to handle any contingency in the digital age. 

 This is the Digital World and I am not a Native. I am in little position to “prepare” my eight-year-olds, but rather they will soon teach me—I hope.

I’m not sure yet how to effectively organize the Digital Scouts of the Planet, and I am probably too old even for that task, but I do know that if we want to be prepared, we gotta stop rubbing sticks together and start thinking about fixing our BlackBerrys on the fly.

Using kids to teach the adults is not a new idea.  However, systemattically using kids to achieve digital literacy is a new idea. 

Leave a comment

Filed under literacy, Uncategorized

Customer vs. Creator

Scoble relates a comment from a blogger who questions Microsoft’s ability to “wrap its head” around the concept of Web 2.0 while it considers its users “customers” not “creators”.

Kaliya, Identity Woman, says that to Microsoft we are just customers. “It seems to me that their language regarding those of us who use their stuff – customers. Individuals who buy stuff most notably not creators.â€?

So, if you consider every customer a creator who takes your product and service to invent something else — does that change your relationship with that “creator”?

Leave a comment

Filed under Models, Uncategorized

Healthy, Wealthy and Wise (accessing, understanding information)

A column in Always On points out how the trend in information needs for healthcare, career development, and life will support continuous education.

desotoLifelong learning will be a core fundamental to anybody in business in the future. Continuing education will be part of this, but learning new skills and adapting to a global marketplace in a knowledge-based economy will be critical to survive and thrive.

Michael Moe also says services to provide information and learning will help people feel young.  Could it be this is the Fountain of Youth for which de Soto searched?

Then comes Google offering a finance section to their search services… Now who will launch an education section?google finance A Legislative Section?  Imagine making tracking legislative changes as easy as watching stocks! 

Leave a comment

Filed under LMI, Uncategorized

Bill Moyers – A Righteous Man

I didn’t know Mr. Moyers was a Baptist Minister. I do subscribe to his beliefs as annunciated in an article in Winston Salem:

Like a revival preacher, Moyers called others to join in the “heresy” of confronting those who have managed to “subvert democracy in the name of God and greed.” We must, he said, practice “the religion of Jesus” rather than “religion about Jesus.” We must challenge “the charlatans and demagogues,” to renew the fight for social justice and to exercise the historic Baptist principle of “soul freedom.” That, he said, means not letting “charlatans and demagogues” hijack Christianity and end the promise of democracy.

You need to read the article.  Then, you need to read Kevin Phillip’s new book, American Theocracy, followed by Jimmy Carter’s book Our Endangered Values.  And, if you are still up to it, read The Dark Age Ahead, by Jane Jacobs.

Let me know when you are finished — or will that be necessary?

Leave a comment

Filed under Religion, Uncategorized

Ignorance is no defense

We have heard the phrase often that “ignorance of the law” is no defense.  But, at what point, ethically, morally and legally, is government obligated to inform you of the law.  How much effort should government expend to insure that you the consumer, parent, business owner, student, etc, understand the implications of new legislation and how your life is governed by statute, rule or regulation?

Here is a list of bills that can affect you positively, or negatively, without any mechanism, resources or funds to explain those affects to you:

  • SB 596 – Umbilical Cord Blood Bank
  • SB 425 – UnSpam Bill
  • SB 594 –
  • SB 534 – Adult Advertising in Emails
  • SB 394
  • SB 535 – Title Pawn

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Government Information, Uncategorized

Access and Accuracy

Article in Atlanta Journal Constitution notes that Fulton County does not warranty the information presented on its web site:

 “Fulton County makes no representations or warranties as to the suitability of this information . . . and that to the extent you use or implement this information . . . you do so at your own risk.”

So much for ease of access.  If it isn’t accurate, it isn’t accessible.

Leave a comment

Filed under Government Information, Uncategorized

Information, Access and Self Responsibility

With all the talk about the need for individuals to take responsibility for their own health care, this story about a drug used to treat Parkinson’s Disease highlights the fundamental “weakness” in the argument.  You must “know” in order to act responsibly.  Read this quote:

Kodam dismissed the existing warnings as too little too late: “The warning label is a joke,” he said. “To bury five to six words on Page 17 when the effects are so catastrophic is ridiculous. You need a clear descriptive warning label and notification to doctors to ask patients about this potential effect.”

So, how will you know that you have the information necessary to make the decision?  Who is teaching you how to analyze, synthesize, and rationalize?

To make matters more complex, some information (also known as concepts or ideas) is protected be patent.  For example, today in an essay published in the New York Times, Michael Crichton tells us the following can’t be used without royalties being paid to the owner of the patent:

Elevated homocysteine is linked to B-12 deficiency, so doctors should test homocysteine levels to see whether the patient needs vitamins.

He drives his point home with this conclusion:

Oh, and by the way: I own the patent for “essay or letter criticizing a previous publication.” So anyone who criticizes what I have said here had better pay a royalty first, or I’ll see you in court.

Of course, you may defend youself in court with the “prior art” defense, and certainly may cite examples of Ben Franklin’s essays as part of your defense (providing of course, you recognize any and all rights to publications cited as reference for such essays).  But, that costs money, takes time and certainly creates a barrier to access to information that, in my unpatented opinion, should not exist.

Leave a comment

Filed under Education, Uncategorized

Fundamentalism and Science

Conversation in the hall yesterday regarding fundmentalism and its appearance (strength)as a predictor of “dark ages”.  Think about it — it would be an inverse relationship as an increase in fundamentalist thinking suppresses science, engineering, innovation and cultural enlightenment.

No links here.  Just “Deep Thinking…”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized